Subject Guides
- Binghamton University Libraries
- Subject Guides
- Course Pages
- HIST 480G: Biography as History
- Evaluating Sources for Research
HIST 480G: Biography as History
Guide Contents
Help with the Research Process
For help with selecting/narrowing a topic and finding resources, check out the Libraries' guide:
Librarian
Types of Publications
Monograph
A single book written on one topic
Edited Volume
A book on one theme/topic with chapters on different themes/topics written by different authors
Conference Proceedings
A book with chapters written by each presenter for one conference
Journal Articles
Individual articles written by authors on a specific topic
Book Reviews
Articles written by authors reviewing one or more books; not typically peer reviewed
Types of Sources
Primary Sources
Materials created at the time under study, that serve as original evidence documenting a time period, event, people, idea, or work. Primary sources can be printed materials (such as books and ephemera), manuscript/archival materials (such as diaries or ledgers), audio/visual materials (such as recordings or films), artifacts (such as clothes or personal belongings), or born-digital materials (such as emails or digital photographs). Primary sources can be found in analog, digitized, and born-digital forms. Newspapers are considered primary sources when they document an eyewitness account of an event, are used to understand interpretations/impressions of a period, are used for analysis of advertisements, etc.
Secondary Sources
Works that synthesize and/or comment on primary and/or other secondary sources. Secondary sources, which are often works of scholarship, are differentiated from primary sources by the element of critical synthesis, analysis, or commentary. Secondary sources are most often scholarly books and journal articles. Newspapers are considered secondary sources when they synthesize past reports, are research-based, and/or are used for background information on your topic.
Tertiary Sources
Works that index, abstract, organize, compile, or digest other sources, and typically present that content with relevant context.
Some definitions taken from the ACRL Guide for Primary Source Literacy
Evaluating Primary Sources
Some topics to consider when evaluating primary sources:
- AuthenticityThe authenticity of records and documents is usually presumed, but if questioned it can sometimes be verified by testing physical and stylistic characteristics of a record. Authenticity alone does not automatically imply that the content of a record is reliable.
- AuthorityAs relates to primary sources, authority may refer to the relative credibility and expertise of the creator(s) of a source.
- BiasA prejudice in favor of one thing or person over another. Sources may include the biases of their creator(s) and of the individuals and institutions that collect these sources. A source may reflect unconscious or unintentional bias.
- CreatorThe individual, family, group, or organization that is responsible for a source's production, accumulation, or formation. Creators of primary sources include artists, authors, and manufacturers.
- Cultural UnderstandingConsidering the viewpoint of those from other cultures, whether in the present or past; considering shared or conflicted history portrayed in the source; and understanding the importance of studying and preserving records created from many points of view.
- Historical ContextThe ability to appreciate the beliefs, values, and intentions of historical actors and to see and appreciate sources within their particular time period and geographical location.
- MediationThe amount of intervention and contextualization between the user and the source. Mediation could be added content (like a written introduction); translation; or librarians/archivists' organization and arrangement of materials.
- SilencesGaps or missing pieces in the historical record, often caused by those who were unable to write their own records, or whose records were not considered valuable or were suppressed by the dominant culture.
Download this list as a handout:
Evaluating Books
Title
Words used in the title can often give you clues about a book's intended audience or purpose. Scholarly books usually have titles that sound more formal. For example, books with titles like Complexity and Evolution: Toward a New Synthesis for Economics have a much greater likelihood of being scholarly as compared to books with titles like Business Cat: Money, Power, Treats.
Publication Date
Timeliness and currency are important when selecting a book for your research. Whether or not a book is considered current will vary greatly depending on the discipline and the particular topic. Additionally, since it can take years to write and publish a book, if you're looking for the most up-to-date information available, you may need to consult other types of sources that have a faster publication cycle.
Citations
Authors of scholarly books cite their sources using formal citation styles like Chicago, MLA, APA, or others. These references may appear as parenthetical citations, footnotes, endnotes, or bibliographies. When evaluating the quality of a scholarly book, it's often useful to examine these citations to get a better sense of the relationship between the book and other scholarly work on the topic.
Tone and Language
The text of scholarly books will usually have a more serious tone and use formal or technical language that may not be easily understood by a general audience.
Author/Editor
Scholarly books are almost always written by professors or researchers affiliated with universities or research institutes. Some scholarly books, often called edited books or edited volumes, are co-authored by a group of people who are each responsible for a particular chapter. The editors of edited volumes are also professors or researchers.
Most scholarly books list their authors' and/or editors' credentials (i.e., affiliations with universities or research institutes, previous publications, and sometimes academic degrees). This information can be useful in determining whether someone is considered an authority on the topic they're writing about.
Publisher
There are several different categories of publishers, each specializing in particular types of book. Understanding who published the book will help inform your analysis of the book's content.
Types of Publishers:
University Press
Scholarly books, e.g. Harvard University Press
Professional titles
Professional, technical, reference, textbooks, e.g. Wiley, Scholastic
Research Center/Institute titles
Scholarly (often reporting research produced by members of the center or institute), e.g. Pew Research Center; Brookings Institution Press
Commercial/Trade Publications
Popular/mass-marketed, e.g. Random House, Penguin
Open Access Publications
Scholarly, Textbooks, e.g. Muse Open, National Academies Press
Evaluating Journals
Professors often suggest that students include articles from scholarly, refereed, or peer-reviewed journals as resources for their research papers. These articles are authored by experts in their fields and reviewed by peers before getting accepted for publication. See the information below to help you distinguish between the three main types of periodicals.
Popular Magazine
e.g., Time Magazine
Appearance: Highly visual, lots of advertising and photos.
Audience: General readership
Content: Popular magazines contain feature stories, reviews, and editorials, and may report research findings as news.
Articles:
- Are meant to entertain and inform.
- Use popular language, geared toward the average reader.
- Written by staff writers (not always named), or freelance writers.
- Generally short in length (1-10 pages).
- Rarely include references or footnotes.
- Evaluated by editorial staff, but may not be reviewed by experts in the field.
Scholarly Journal
e.g. Journal of American Studies
Appearance: Sober design, little advertising, mostly text with some graphs and tables.
Audience: Students, researchers, scholars, specialists in a particular subject.
Content: Scholarly journals contain original research, theoretical issues, and new developments in the subject discipline.
Articles:
- Present the results of original research performed by the authors; often include a review of existing literature on the topic.
- Include specialized vocabulary of a subject discipline.
- Written by subject specialists identified by name, with degrees and academic affiliation usually given.
- Generally medium-length to long (5-20 pages or more).
- Meticulously documented; extensive references and/or footnotes.
- Most often peer-reviewed by other authorities in the field to validate findings.
Trade Journal
e.g. Steel Times International
Appearance: Visual; some advertising related to the field, photos.
Audience: Members of a particular trade, profession or industry.
Content: Trade and professional journals contain news, trends, technical and practical aspects of the trade, profession or industry.
Articles:
- May present industry news and/or original research.
- Include specialized vocabulary of a trade, profession or industry.
- Written by staff writers and freelancers, usually professionals in the field.
- Generally short to medium-length (1-20 pages)
- May contain a few references or footnotes.
- Evaluated by editorial staff that may include experts in the field, but not peer-reviewed.
Please note that not all articles found in magazines, or journals, will contain the noted characteristics. Use careful judgement in determining if an article in a scholarly journal actually presents in-depth, original research, or if an article in a magazine or trade journal goes beyond presenting news and current trends